🔗 Share this article

They describe themselves as the "salvage squad". Following their sudden termination when international support faced cuts earlier this year, a collective of committed professionals chose to establish their own emergency initiative.

Choosing not to "wallow in misery", a former economist, along with like-minded ex-colleagues, began endeavors to save some of the vital projects that were at risk after the cuts.

Now, nearly eighty projects have been rescued by a connector platform operated by the economist and other former aid staff, which has obtained them over $110m in recent backing. The collective behind the Project Resource Optimization initiative calculates it will benefit millions of people, encompassing many young kids.

After the office shutdown, financial flows stopped, numerous staff lost their jobs, and global initiatives either stopped abruptly or were left limping toward what Rosenbaum terms "drop-dead dates".

He and several team members were contacted by a philanthropic organization that "aimed to figure out how they could make the best use of their constrained funds".

They created a menu from the cancelled projects, selecting those "delivering the most life-saving aid per dollar" and where a alternative supporter could realistically get involved and continue the work.

They quickly recognized the need was broader than that initial entity and commenced to reach out to other potential donors.

"We referred to ourselves as the emergency squad at the start," states Rosenbaum. "The organization has been sinking, and there are insufficient lifeboats for every project to board, and so we're striving to actually rescue as many infants as we can, get as many on to these rescue options as feasible, via the initiatives that are providing support."

The project, now working as part of a global development thinktank, has obtained financial support for seventy-nine initiatives on its list in in excess of 30 nations. Three have had initial backing returned. A number were unable to be rescued in time.

Funding has been provided by a mix of charitable organizations and private benefactors. Many wish to remain unidentified.

"These donors stem from diverse reasons and perspectives, but the common thread that we've received from them is, 'I am appalled by what's going on. I sincerely wish to find a method to help,'" notes Rosenbaum.

"I believe that there was an 'aha moment' for everyone involved as we commenced efforts on this, that this provided an possibility to transition from the passive sadness, wallowing in the distress of everything that was occurring around us, to having something productive to fully engage with."

A specific initiative that has secured backing through the effort is operations by the Alliance for International Medical Action to provide services encompassing nutritional rehabilitation, maternity services and essential immunizations for kids in Mali.

It is vital to keep such programmes going, states the economist, not only because reinitiating work if they ceased would be extremely costly but also because of how much reliance would be lost in the zones of instability if the organization pulled out.

"The organization informed us […] 'we're very worried that if we withdraw, we may never be invited back.'"

Projects with longer-term goals, such as bolstering healthcare networks, or in other fields such as schooling, have remained outside the project's focus. It also does not seek to preserve programmes forever but to "buy time for the groups and, honestly, the larger network, to determine a sustainable answer".

After securing support for all projects on its first selection, the initiative says it will now prioritize assisting additional individuals with "tested, efficient solutions".